文章主题：ChatGPT, 学生作弊, 人工智能论文
🎓📝震惊时刻！美国教授邂逅学术界“超新星”——一篇学生论文惊艳至极，完全超越了他平日的高标准。这位教育家不禁心生疑惑：现代科技的力量，是否已悄然渗透到知识的殿堂？于是，他决定一探究竟，将这份杰作交到了人工智能领域的明星ChatGPT手中。结果揭晓，ChatGPT的精准分析证实了他的担忧——这篇论文的智慧，确实非人类寻常。🚀
原文改写如下：👀揭示教育新现象！📚北密歇根大学惊现ChatGPT代笔论文，据《商业内幕》深度报道，该校宗教研究与哲学领域的知名教授安东尼·奥曼近期留意到两位学生的学术作业存在显著异常。这位学界权威发现，这两篇作品的创新思维和流畅表述，与ChatGPT的高度智能化水平不谋而合。这一事件引发了对于技术对教育影响的深入探讨，也对学生们诚信学习的呼吁响起。学术诚信，不容忽视！🎓📚
Antony Aumann, a religious studies and philosophy professor at Northern Michigan University, told Insider he had caught two students submitting essays written by the AI chatbot ChatGPT.🌟奥曼教授盛赞一篇学术文章，他表示：”这篇作品展现出了超乎寻常的才华和深度，语法精准无瑕，结构严谨得体，仿佛是学界的璀璨新星（stellar debut）。观点新颖独特，挑战了传统的认知边界（pushing boundaries），这无疑是一个令人惊艳的突破（awe-inspiring leap）”。然而，他微笑着提到，这样的高水平也可能带来一些警示信号（hidden alarm bells），提示我们不应忽视年轻才俊可能带来的颠覆性思考（subversive insights）。”这位教育界的权威人士（renowned educator）强调，期待看到更多这样的创新与成长（more innovation and growth），同时也提醒大家要保持批判性思维（critical thinking），以确保学术的严谨和进步（rigor and progress）。”
“The red flag was that the essay was written better than most of my students can write. The grammar was too perfect, the structure was too sound, and the ideas were kind of too advanced for what I would expect from my students.” Aumann said in an interview.
🌟探究真相，他巧妙地将学生的作品输入🔥ChatGPT，轻声询问：“这创作之笔，确是你所为吗？”ChatGPT毫不犹豫地回应：“99.9%的可信度，不容小觑。”
“So, what I did was, I took that essay and submitted it to ChatGPT, and I asked it, Hey, did you write this? It replied that there was a 99.9 percent chance that it did.”
🌟学术界新动态🌟——揭示AI力量！据弗曼大学哲学大家Darren Hick教授分享，近期惊现一例，一名学子提交了论文，竟是由ChatGPT这位智慧“笔友”创作而成！这无疑引发了教育与科技领域的深度探讨，人工智能在学术创作中的角色正悄然转变。🎓🚀
A few weeks after the launch of ChatGPT, Darren Hick, a philosophy professor at Furman University, said he caught a student turning in an AI-generated essay.🎓研究人员希克教授近期揭示了一项令人震惊的发现——一篇看似学术严谨的文章中暗藏了不少精心编造的错误信息（巧妙的误导性内容），这些错误不仅误导了读者，也挑战了传统的知识权威。当他深入剖析这篇论文时，他敏锐地察觉到一些线索，这些线索指向了一个可能的真相——AI技术在其中扮演了不为人知的角色。使用ChatGPT这一先进的检测工具后，数据给出了惊人的答案：高达99%的可能性，这篇文章并非出自人类之手，而是由人工智能生成的傀儡文字。
Hick said he grew suspicious when the student turned in an on-topic essay that included some well-written misinformation. After running it through Open AIs ChatGPT detector, the results said it was 99% likely the essay had been AI-generated.这两位教授都表示，在他们与学生对峙后，学生们都承认了违规行为。最终，希克教授的学生考试不及格，奥曼教授则让他的学生重写论文。
Both Hick and Aumann said they confronted their students, all of whom eventually confessed to the infraction. Hicks student failed the class and Aumann had his students rewrite the essays from scratch.奥曼教授表示，“我希望学生们真正学到知识，而他们能做到这一点的唯一方法就是真正由自己完成作业。”
“I want the students to actually learn the material, and the only way they can do that is by actually completing the assignment,” Aumann said.《商业内幕网》报道：两名教授表示发现学生使用ChatGPT在论文中作弊，他们解释了为什么人工智能抄袭很难被证明。
不仅仅是大学教授在为ChatGPT等人工智能聊天机器人的崛起而困扰。据《纽约时报》报道，由于几乎所有能上网的人都能使用这些人工智能工具，美国各地的教育部门都在调整工作流程，重新设计整个课程，迫使学生提交手写论文或引入口试 （oral exams）。
Its not just Aumann struggling with the rise of AI chatbots like ChatGPT. As a result of these tools becoming accessible to pretty much anybody with an internet connection, education departments across the entire country are adjusting workflows and redesigning entire courses, according to the NYT, forcing students to submit handwritten essays or introducing oral exams.此外，纽约市和西雅图的公立学校已经完全禁止在他们自己的网络和设备上使用ChatGPT。
The New York City and Seattle public school systems have already banned ChatGPT outright on own networks and devices.
CGTN视频截图
对此，奥曼教授表示，他认为“禁令背后的情绪是合理的”。“学校希望确保学生学习和拥有批判性思维 （critical thinking），这是学习写作的一部分。”
“I think the sentiment behind the ban is reasonable,” Aumann said. “They want to make sure that their students are learning the critical thinking skills that are part of learning how to write.”然而，大学不太可能效仿。毕竟，学生绕开这些限制是非常容易的。即使是那些旨在帮助教师发现学生偷偷使用ChatGPT等人工智能工具的检测工具，也可能没有多大用处。
But universities arent likely to follow suit. After all, skirting around these restrictions is trivially easy. Even tools designed to assist teachers in catching students secretly making use of AI tools like ChatGPT will likely be of little use.“学生可以修改ChatGPT生成的几个单词，加入一些语法错误，检测工具就发现不了这是聊天机器人写的了。” 奥曼教授表示，“这些检测工具也会随着时间的推移而改进吗？会。但可能还不足以跟上人工智能聊天机器人本身的发展速度。”
“Students can change a few words from what ChatGPT produced, introduce some grammatical infelicities, and the detectors no longer think its written by a chatbot,” Aumann said. “Will these detectors also improve with time? Yes. But probably not enough to keep pace with the development of the chatbots themselves.”
CGTN视频截图
奥曼教授还认为，随着ChatGPT的发布，木已成舟 （the cat is already out of the bag），所以在课堂上与ChatGPT对抗是毫无意义的。
Besides, the cat is already out of the bag — so itd be pointless to fight ChatGPT in the classroom, the professor argued.就算学校禁止使用，“学生们一毕业就可以使用它，”他说。“此外，学生们本来就在哀叹‘现实生活’和‘学术’之间存在巨大鸿沟。因此，在我看来，忽视ChatGPT或只是试图阻止它的使用是一个巨大的错误，”教授总结道。
“Students will have access to it the second they graduate,” he said. “Plus, students already lament that there is a big gulf between real life and academia.” “So, ignoring ChatGPT or just trying to prevent its use is a big mistake, in my mind,” Aumann concluded.对奥曼教授来说，他已经决定调整自己的论文写作课程，要求学生在课堂上用正在被实时监控 （actively monitored）的电脑来写作初稿。他还计划鼓励他的哲学系学生“像对待其他哲学资源一样对待ChatGPT”，这意味着他们将被要求评估其论据和论点 （reasons and arguments）。
For his part, Aumann has decided to adjust his own essay writing course, and will require drafts to be written in the classroom on computers that are being actively monitored. Hes planning on encouraging his philosophy students to “react to ChatGPT in the same way they would any other philosophical source,” meaning that they will be asked to evaluate its reasons and arguments.综合来源：商业内幕网，CGTN America，Futurism网，纽约时报，央视网
AI时代，掌握AI大模型第一手资讯！AI时代不落人后！
免费ChatGPT问答，办公、写作、生活好得力助手！
扫码右边公众号，驾驭AI生产力！
